The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-7862•United States of America v. Kenyatta Hasani Adams
08-7862Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 23, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7862
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
KENYATTA HASANI ADAMS,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior
District Judge. (2:07-cr-00113-RGD-JEB-1)
Submitted: April 16, 2009 Decided: April 23, 2009
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenyatta Hasani Adams, Appellant Pro Se. Sherrie Scott
Capotosto, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kenyatta Hasani Adams appeals the district court’s
order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion and its
subsequent order denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Adams, No. 2:07-cr-00113-RGD-JEB-1 (E.D. Va. July 17, 2008;
filed Aug. 13, 2008; entered Aug. 18, 2008). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.