The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-7854•United States of America v. Laricco Eugene Sherrill
08-7854Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 26, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7854
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
LARICCO EUGENE SHERRILL,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad,
Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:04-cr-00220-RJC-CH-1)
Submitted: March 17, 2009 Decided: March 26, 2009
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Claire J. Rauscher, Executive Director, FEDERAL DEFENDERS OF
WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA, INC., Matthew R. Segal, Assistant
Federal Public Defender, Asheville, North Carolina, for
Appellant. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney,
Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Laricco Eugene Sherrill appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for a reduced sentence pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the motions for
appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See United States v. Sherrill, No. 3:04-cr-
00220-RJC-CH-1 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 27, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.