The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-7840•United States of America v. Keithroy Noel Clarke
08-7840Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 20, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7840
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
KEITHROY NOEL CLARKE,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District
Judge. (2:97-cr-00166-RBS-4)
Submitted: January 13, 2009 Decided: January 20, 2009
Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KING, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Keithroy Noel Clarke, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro Tayman,
Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Keithroy Noel Clarke appeals the district court’s
order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm the judgment of the district court. United States v.
Clarke, No. 2:97-cr-00166-RBS-4 (E.D. Va. filed July 31, 2008;
entered Aug. 1, 2008). We dispense with oral argument as the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and oral argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.