The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-7791•Byron Joseph Knox v. JOSEPH M. BROOKS, Warden
08-7791Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 25, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7791
BYRON JOSEPH KNOX,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOSEPH M. BROOKS, Warden,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
Judge. (2:06-cv-00221-JBF-TEM)
Submitted: February 19, 2009 Decided: February 25, 2009
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Byron Joseph Knox, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Lynn Watt, Assistant
United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Byron Joseph Knox appeals the district court’s order
dismissing as untimely his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v.
Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S.
388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Knox v. Brooks, No. 2:06-cv-00221-JBF-TEM (E.D.
Va. Aug. 4, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.