The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-7719•Kevin D. Walker v. AUTHUR SMITH, Department of Police
08-7719Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 9, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7719
KEVIN D. WALKER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
AUTHUR SMITH, Department of Police; S. L. SCHULTZ, #2552; G.
BRANDT, #1537; KNODE, Ofc.; DIETZ, Ofc.; CINDY MESSER SMITH,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:07-cv-02717-RDB)
Submitted: January 28, 2009 Decided: February 9, 2009
Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kevin D. Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Douglas Peter,
Hanover, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kevin D. Walker appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to Defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2000) civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See Walker v. Smith, No. 1:07-cv-02717-
RDB (D. Md. Aug. 19, 2008). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.