Phillip Mark Shafer v. CHRISTINE ELLIS, Individually & Officially; DANA MAYLON, Ethics Commissioner

08-7689Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 4, 2010

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7689
PHILLIP MARK SHAFER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CHRISTINE ELLIS, Individually & Officially; DANA MAYLON,
Ethics Commissioner,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District
Judge. (8:08-cv-00482-PJM)
Submitted: May 21, 2010 Decided: June 4, 2010
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Phillip Mark Shafer, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Phillip Mark Shafer appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Shafer v. Ellis, No. 8:08-cv-00482-PJM (D. Md.
Feb. 29, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.