The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-7689•Phillip Mark Shafer v. CHRISTINE ELLIS, Individually & Officially; DANA MAYLON, Ethics Commissioner
08-7689Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 4, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7689
PHILLIP MARK SHAFER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CHRISTINE ELLIS, Individually & Officially; DANA MAYLON,
Ethics Commissioner,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District
Judge. (8:08-cv-00482-PJM)
Submitted: May 21, 2010 Decided: June 4, 2010
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Phillip Mark Shafer, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Phillip Mark Shafer appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Shafer v. Ellis, No. 8:08-cv-00482-PJM (D. Md.
Feb. 29, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.