The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-7683•Marlin Davis v. WARDEN, Federal Correctional Institution at Estill
08-7683Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 21, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7683
MARLIN DAVIS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN, Federal Correctional Institution at Estill,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge.
(3:07-cv-00606-HFF)
Submitted: June 30, 2009 Decided: July 21, 2009
Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marlin Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens,
Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Marlin Davis, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate
judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006)
petition. Davis also appeals the district court’s order
summarily denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See Davis v. Warden, No. 3:07-cv-00606-
HFF (D.S.C. filed Feb. 12, 2008 & entered Feb. 13, 2008; July
31, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.