United States of America v. Kelly George Stanback

08-7631Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 3, 2009

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7631
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
KELLY GEORGE STANBACK,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Samuel G. Wilson,
District Judge. (5:02-cr-30020-sgw-1)
Submitted: July 30, 2009 Decided: August 3, 2009
Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kelly George Stanback, Appellant Pro Se. Jeb Thomas Terrien,
Assistant United States Attorney, Harrisonburg, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Kelly George Stanback appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for an extension of time to file a 28
U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2009) motion. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Stanback, No. 5:02-cr-30020-sgw-1 (W.D. Va. July 24, 2008). We
deny Stanback’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.