The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-7625•United States of America v. Nicholean Bernard Hicklen, Jr.
08-7625Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 16, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7625
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
NICHOLEAN BERNARD HICKLEN, JR.,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney,
District Judge. (3:99-cr-00187-FDW-1)
Submitted: January 13, 2009 Decided: January 16, 2009
Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KING, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nicholean Bernard Hicklen, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth
Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Nicholean Bernard Hicklen, Jr., appeals the district
court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion
for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. United States v. Hicklen, No.
3:99-cr-00187-FDW-1 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 11, 2008). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.