The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-7611•United States of America v. John Eric Hughes
08-7611Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 5, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7611
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JOHN ERIC HUGHES,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief
District Judge. (3:00-cr-00004-JRS-2)
Submitted: February 26, 2009 Decided: March 5, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Eric Hughes, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Cornell Wallace,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
John Eric Hughes appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence filed
under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant
Hughes’ motion to file a supplemental informal brief, we deny
Hughes’ motions to stay the appeal and to modify or correct the
record and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
United States v. Hughes, No. 3:00-cr-00004-JRS-2 (E.D. Va. Aug.
1, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.