The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-7587•David Stevens v. Ernest Wilson; South Carolina Department of Corrections; Ridgeville Police Department
08-7587Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 3, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7587
DAVID STEVENS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ERNEST WILSON; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS;
RIDGEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief
District Judge. (0:07-cv-03590-JFA)
Submitted: May 28, 2009 Decided: June 3, 2009
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Stevens, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
David Stevens appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and
dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Stevens v. Wilson, No. 0:07-cv-03590-JFA
(D.S.C. filed July 29, 2008 & entered July 30, 2008). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.