The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-7576•United States of America v. Cleveland Robinson
08-7576Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 5, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7576
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CLEVELAND ROBINSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Senior
District Judge. (1:91-cr-00161-2)
Submitted: February 26, 2009 Decided: March 5, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cleveland Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Marla Brooke Tusk,
Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Cleveland Robinson appeals the district court’s order
granting a two―level reduction but denying his motion for
further reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)
(2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Robinson, No. 1:91-cr-00161-2
(E.D. Va. July 14, 2008, entered July 15, 2008); see United
States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir. 2009). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.