The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-7572•United States of America v. Anthony Graham
08-7572Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 16, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7572
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
ANTHONY GRAHAM,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson,
District Judge. (4:07-cr-00091-RAJ-JEB-1)
Submitted: January 13, 2009 Decided: January 16, 2009
Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KING, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Graham, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew Hurt, Assistant
United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Graham appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2)(2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See United States v. Graham, No.
4:07-cr-00091-RAJ-JEB-1 (E.D. Va. July 14, 2008). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.