The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-7554•United States of America v. Derrick Vincent Redd
08-7554Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 17, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7554
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DERRICK VINCENT REDD,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 08-7555
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DERRICK VINCENT REDD,
Defendant – Appellant.
No. 08-7642
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
-- 1 of 3 --
DERRICK VINCENT REDD,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (1:97-cr-00006-JCC-1)
Submitted: February 25, 2009 Decided: March 17, 2009
Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Derrick Vincent Redd, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Derrick Vincent Redd
appeals district court orders denying his post-conviction
motions for grand jury transcripts, the grand jury concurrence
form and a copy of the form recording the examination done on
the firearm. We affirm.
Redd failed to show any particularized need for any of
the documents. Accordingly, we affirm the district court
orders. We deny his motions for a copy of the transcript at
Government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.