The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-7527•United States of America v. Michael Brown, a/k/a Rasheem Russell, a/k/a Hakeem Brown, a/k/a Rasheem Jamal…
08-7527Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 22, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7527
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MICHAEL BROWN, a/k/a Rasheem Russell, a/k/a Hakeem Brown,
a/k/a Rasheem Jamal Russell, a/k/a Michael Haseem Brown,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:01-cr-00023-CMH-1)
Submitted: June 18, 2009 Decided: June 22, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Kathleen Marie Kahoe,
Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Brown appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. United States v. Brown, No. 1:01-
cr-00023-CMH-1 (E.D. Va. filed July 14, 2008 & entered July 16,
2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.