The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-7496•United States of America v. Marquise D. Carter
08-7496Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 23, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7496
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MARQUISE D. CARTER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:07-cr-00288-CMH-1)
Submitted: December 16, 2008 Decided: December 23, 2008
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marquise D. Carter, Appellant Pro Se. Jack Hanly, Assistant
United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Marquise D. Carter appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to amend his restitution judgment. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Carter,
No. 1:07-cr-00288-CMH-1 (E.D. Va. July 14, 2008). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.