The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-7475•United States of America v. Kenneth Bruce Krohn
08-7475Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 29, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7475
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
KENNETH BRUCE KROHN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District
Judge. (1:77-cr-00162-LO-1)
Submitted: June 30, 2010 Decided: July 29, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth Bruce Krohn, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Walters, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kenneth Bruce Krohn appeals the district court’s
orders denying his petition for writ of error coram nobis and
denying his subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
United States v. Krohn, No. 1:77-cr-00162-LO-1 (E.D. Va. filed &
entered Apr. 7, 2008; filed June 9, 2008 & entered June 10,
2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.