The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-7415•Jacqueline Stanton Stewart, a/k/a Jackie v. United States of America
08-7415Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 1, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7415
JACQUELINE STANTON STEWART, a/k/a Jackie,
Defendant - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Jerome B. Friedman,
District Judge. (4:05-cr-00009-WDK-JEB-27)
Submitted: November 20, 2008 Decided: December 1, 2008
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jacqueline Stanton Stewart, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew
Hurt, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jacqueline Stanton Stewart appeals the district
court’s order denying relief on her motion for modification
sentence, 28 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Stewart, No. 4:05-cr-00009-WDK-JEB-27 (E.D. Va. filed July 7,
2008; entered July 10, 2008). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.