United States of America v. Monty Marshall, a/k/a Mustafa

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7363
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
MONTY MARSHALL, a/k/a Mustafa,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior
District Judge. (4:02-cr-00002-RGD-TEM-1)
Submitted: January 13, 2009 Decided: January 15, 2009
Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KING, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Monty Marshall, Appellant Pro Se. Timothy Richard Murphy,
Special Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Monty Williams appeals the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction
of sentence based on Amendment 706, as modified by Amendment
711, and Amendment 715 of the United States Sentencing
Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Marshall, No. 4:02-cr-0002-
RGD-TEM-1 (E.D. Va. July 14, 2008). In addition, we find that
the court did not abuse its discretion in declining to appoint
counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --