The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-7268•Antonio Saunders v. OFFICER DICKERSON, Master Jail Officer, Classification Officer
08-7268Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 27, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7268
ANTONIO SAUNDERS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OFFICER DICKERSON, Master Jail Officer, Classification
Officer; R. CHERRY, Superintendent; C. PERKINS, Commonwealth
Attorney; H. GWYNN, Assistant Commonwealth Attorney; JANE
DOE, Commonwealth Attorney Office Employee,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:07-cv-01094-LMB)
Submitted: January 30, 2009 Decided: February 27, 2009
Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Antonio Saunders, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Antonio Saunders appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Saunders v. Dickerson, No. 1:07-cv-
01094-LMB (E.D. Va. June 25, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.