The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-7250•United States of America v. Anson Diaz Lawrence
08-7250Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 5, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7250
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ANSON DIAZ LAWRENCE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr.,
Senior District Judge. (2:00-cr-00052-HCM-1)
Submitted: January 7, 2009 Decided: February 5, 2009
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anson Diaz Lawrence, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Anson Diaz Lawrence appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find the
district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the
motion. See United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th
Cir. 2004) (motion under § 3582(c) “is subject to the discretion
of the district court”); United States v. Legree, 205 F.3d 724,
727 (4th Cir. 2000). Thus, we affirm the district court’s order
for the reasons stated there. See United States v. Lawrence,
No. 2:00-cr-00052-HCM-1 (E.D. Va. June 24, 2008). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.