The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-7209•United States of America v. Reginald Cuttino Melvin
08-7209Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 17, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7209
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
REGINALD CUTTINO MELVIN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,
District Judge. (1:02-cr-00201-NCT-1)
Submitted: December 4, 2008 Decided: December 17, 2008
Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Reginald Cuttino Melvin, Appellant Pro Se. Joan Brodish
Binkley, Lisa Blue Boggs, Assistant United States Attorneys,
Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Reginald Cuttino Melvin appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying his claim for exemption and request for a hearing, and
denying his motion to stay disposition of seized property. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Melvin, No. 1:02-cr-00201-NCT-1
(M.D.N.C. June 20, 2008). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.