The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-7145•United States of America v. Jason Hagood
08-7145Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 16, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7145
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JASON HAGOOD,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
Judge. (6:01-cr-00828-HMH-2)
Submitted: March 12, 2009 Decided: March 16, 2009
Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jason Hagood, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard, Regan
Alexandra Pendleton, Assistant United States Attorneys,
Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jason Hagood appeals the district court’s order
granting in part and denying in part his motion for reduction of
sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm. United States v. Hagood, No. 6:01-cr-00828-HMH-2
(D.S.C. June 20, 2008). See United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d
247 (4th Cir. 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.