The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-7137•Thomas J. Barker v. PATRICIA STANSBERRY, Warden
08-7137Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 3, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7137
THOMAS J. BARKER,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
PATRICIA STANSBERRY, Warden,
Respondent – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III,
District Judge. (5:07-hc-02112-D)
Submitted: February 13, 2009 Decided: March 3, 2009
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas J. Barker, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Bredenberg,
Raleigh, North Carolina, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United
States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, Christina Ann
Thompson, BUREAU OF PRISONS, Butner, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Thomas J. Barker, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Barker v. Stansberry, No. 5:07-hc-
02112-D (E.D.N.C. June 16, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.