The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-7110•George D. Gates v. PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden; UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
08-7110Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 29, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7110
GEORGE D. GATES,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden; UNITED STATES PAROLE
COMMISSION,
Respondents – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District
Judge. (1:07-cv-01212-LO-TCB)
Submitted: October 21, 2008 Decided: October 29, 2008
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George D. Gates, Appellant Pro Se. Yiris E. Cornwall, Catherine
DeRoever Wood, Assistant United States Attorneys, Alexandria,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
George D. Gates appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing Gates’ 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition, and its
orders denying Gates’ motions for reconsideration. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons state by the district court. Gates v.
Stansberry, No. 1:07-cv-01212-LO-TCB (E.D. Va. May 23, 2008;
filed June 17, 2008; entered June 19, 2008; filed June 30, 2008;
entered July 1, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.