The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-7104•United States of America v. Warren Andrew Blake, Jr.
08-7104Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 9, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7104
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
WARREN ANDREW BLAKE, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior
District Judge. (7:04-cr-00124-jct-1)
Submitted: May 28, 2009 Decided: June 9, 2009
Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Fay Frances Spence, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Roanoke,
Virginia, for Appellant. Jean Barrett Hudson, Assistant United
States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Warren Andrew Blake, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order granting his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United
States v. Blake, No. 7:04-cr-00124-jct-1 (W.D. Va. June 25,
2008). See United States v. Hood, 556 F.3d 226 (4th Cir. 2009).
We deny Blake’s motion to consolidate and appoint counsel. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.