The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-7102•United States of America v. Jose Luis Acevedo, a/k/a Louie, a/k/a Pedro Pineyro
08-7102Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 24, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7102
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JOSE LUIS ACEVEDO, a/k/a Louie, a/k/a Pedro Pineyro,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (1:92-cr-00427-JCC-1)
Submitted: September 16, 2008 Decided: September 24, 2008
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jose Luis Acevedo, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin L. Hatch, Assistant
United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jose Luis Acevedo appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c) (West
2000 & Supp. 2008). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. United States v. Acevedo, No. 1:92-cr-00427-
JCC-1 (E.D. Va. June 6, 2008). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.