The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-7071•United States of America v. Velvet Renard Legrande, Iii
08-7071Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 24, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7071
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
VELVET RENARD LEGRANDE, III,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief
District Judge. (1:98-cr-00286-NCT-2)
Submitted: September 16, 2008 Decided: September 24, 2008
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas Norman Cochran, Assistant Federal Public Defender,
Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Patrick Auld, Assistant
United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Velvet Renard Legrande, III, appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)
(West 2000 & Supp. 2008). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. United States v. LeGrande, No. 1:98-cr-00286-
NCT-2 (M.D.N.C. June 20, 2008). We deny LeGrande’s motion to
appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.