The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-7057•United States of America v. Erik D. Henderson
08-7057Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 31, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7057
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
ERIK D. HENDERSON,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:04-cr-00343-LMB-1)
Submitted: December 16, 2008 Decided: December 31, 2008
Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Erik D. Henderson, Appellant Pro Se. Mark D. Lytle, Assistant
United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Erik D. Henderson appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to modify sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Henderson, No. 1:04-cr-
00343-LMB-1 (E.D. Va. June 2, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.