The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-7052•United States of America v. Leroy Ellis
08-7052Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 7, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7052
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
LEROY ELLIS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
District Judge. (4:94-cr-70036-jlk-mfu-2; 4:08-cv-80035-jlk-mfu)
Submitted: May 20, 2009 Decided: July 7, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Leroy Ellis, Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Paul Giorno, Assistant
United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Leroy Ellis appeals the district court’s order denying
his petition for redress of grievances. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Ellis, Nos. 4:94-cr-70036-jlk-mfu-2; 4:08-cv-80035-jlk-mfu (W.D.
Va. June 6, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.