The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-6966•United States of America v. Herbert Council
08-6966Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 26, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6966
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
HERBERT COUNCIL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen,
Senior District Judge. (3:92-cr-00097-GCM-20)
Submitted: November 20, 2008 Decided: November 26, 2008
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Herbert Council, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth Michel Smith, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Herbert Council appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) (2000) petition and
denying his motion for reconsideration. Our review of the
record discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm.
We deny Council’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process. In light of this
disposition, we deny as moot Council’s motion for emergency
summary disposition by a single judge.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.