The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-6950•James Wilbert Johnson, a/k/a Wilbert James Johnson v. United States Parole Commission
08-6950Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 15, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6950
JAMES WILBERT JOHNSON, a/k/a Wilbert James Johnson,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:07-cv-00287-HEH)
Submitted: January 13, 2009 Decided: January 15, 2009
Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KING, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Wilbert Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Robert P. McIntosh,
Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James Wilbert Johnson appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Johnson v. U.S. Parole Comm’n, No. 3:07-
cv-00287-HEH (E.D. Va. Apr. 23, 2008). Additionally, we deny
Johnson’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.