The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-6856•United States of America v. Eli Wright
08-6856Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 27, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6856
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ELI WRIGHT,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (7:96-cr-00104-GRA-1)
Submitted: August 21, 2008 Decided: August 27, 2008
Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eli Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Jimmie Ewing, Kevin Frank McDonald,
Assistant United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Eli Wright appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Wright, No. 7:96-cr-00104-
GRA-1 (D.S.C. May 15, 2008). We further deny Wright’s motion for
appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.