United States of America v. Andre Manigault

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6832
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ANDRE MANIGAULT,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief
District Judge. (3:95-cr-00488-JFA-1)
Submitted: October 21, 2008 Decided: October 27, 2008
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Andre Manigault, Appellant Pro Se. Sean Kittrell, Assistant United
States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, Jane Barrett Taylor,
Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

*We note a typographical error in the district court’s order
on page one in the recitation of Manigault’s advisory guideline
calculation. The district court intended to state that Manigault’s
base offense level under the United States Sentencing Guidelines
was 38, not 3, for his violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (2000). This
typographical error does not affect, however, the district court’s
considered reasoning in denying Manigault’s motion for sentence
reduction.
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Andre Manigault appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. * United States v. Manigault, No. 3:95-cr-
00488-JFA-1 (D.S.C. Apr. 25, 2008). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --