The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-6818•United States of America v. Kali A. Hill, a/k/a Eldridge L. Hill, a/k/a Kali, a/k/a Fly
08-6818Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 5, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6818
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
KALI A. HILL, a/k/a Eldridge L. Hill, a/k/a Kali, a/k/a Fly,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District
Judge. (2:03-cr-00162-PMD-1)
Submitted: August 24, 2009 Decided: October 5, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kali A. Hill, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Thomas Phillips,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kali A. Hill appeals the district court’s order
summarily denying his motion to clarify the presentence report.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court. See
United States v. Hill, No. 2:03-cr-00162-PMD-1 (D.S.C. May 1,
2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.