The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-6783•United States of America v. Bobby Samuel Hughes, Jr.
08-6783Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 8, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6783
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
BOBBY SAMUEL HUGHES, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief
District Judge. (3:00-cr-00004-JRS-1)
Submitted: November 6, 2008 Decided: December 8, 2008
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bobby Samuel Hughes, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. David Thomas
Maguire, Elizabeth Wu, Assistant United States Attorneys,
Michael Cornell Wallace, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,
Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Bobby Samuel Hughes, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion for
reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Hughes, No. 3:00-cr-
00004-JRS-1 (E.D. Va. Apr. 25, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.