The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-6737•United States of America v. Teresa Mays, a/k/a Toreatha A. Beaty
08-6737Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 27, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6737
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TERESA MAYS, a/k/a Toreatha A. Beaty,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (0:97-cr-00105-CMC-1)
Submitted: August 21, 2008 Decided: August 27, 2008
Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Teresa Mays, Appellant Pro Se. James Chris Leventis, Jr., OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Teresa Mays appeals the district court’s order denying
her 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000) motion for sentence reduction.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Mays, No. 0:97-cr-00105-CMC-1 (D.S.C. Apr.
24, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.