The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-6649•United States of America v. Vera Etta Baker
08-6649Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 22, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6649
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
VERA ETTA BAKER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District
Judge. (7:06-cr-00034-sgw-2)
Submitted: September 16, 2008 Decided: September 22, 2008
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vera Etta Baker, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Andrew Bassford,
Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Vera Etta Baker appeals the district court’s order
denying her motion for a reduction of sentence filed pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we find the district court did
not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See United States
v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004) (motion under
§ 3582(c) “is subject to the discretion of the district court”);
United States v. Legree, 205 F.3d 724, 727 (4th Cir. 2000). Thus,
we affirm the district court’s order for the reasons stated there.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.