The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-6624•United States of America v. John Howard Hudson, a/k/a Nort
08-6624Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 7, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6624
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
JOHN HOWARD HUDSON, a/k/a Nort,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T.
Copenhaver, Jr., District Judge. (2:99-cr-00048-1)
Submitted: March 10, 2009 Decided: April 7, 2009
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael T. Clifford, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant.
J. Patrick Rowan, Assistant Attorney General, Michael Mullaney,
John W. Van Lonkhuyzen, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
John Howard Hudson timely appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), and motion to supplement. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm. United States v. Hudson, No. 2:99-cr-00048-1 (S.D.
W. Va. Apr. 1, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.