The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-6546•Paulus Irvin Perkins v. BRYAN WATSON, Warden
08-6546Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 20, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6546
PAULUS IRVIN PERKINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BRYAN WATSON, Warden; A. P. HARVEY, Assistant Warden; OFFICER
HENSLEY; A. KILBOURNE, Lieutenant; SERGEANT SCHLUBOOM; OFFICER
COX; MAJOR J. COMBS; DOCTOR JONES; MS. STRAWBERRY; P.
SCARBERRY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District
Judge. (7:07-cv-00526-jct-mfu)
Submitted: August 14, 2008 Decided: August 20, 2008
Before MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Paulus Irvin Perkins, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant
Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Rosalie Fessier, TIMBERLAKE,
SMITH, THOMAS & MOSES, PC, Staunton, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Paulus Irvin Perkins appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Perkins
v. Watson, No. 7:07-cv-00526-jct-mfu (W.D. Va. Mar. 26, 2008). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.