The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-6496•Randy Richard Brooks v. Dr. Waters
08-6496Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 25, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6496
RANDY RICHARD BROOKS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DR. WATERS; MARTHA BLANCO; LEWIS BRESCOACH PAC; SIS R. TRYBUS,
Lieutenant; CHRISTINE SHAFFER; SUSAN MCCLINTOCK,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert E. Maxwell, Senior
District Judge. (2:06-cv-00084-REM-JSK)
Submitted: July 22, 2008 Decided: July 25, 2008
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Randy Richard Brooks, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Campbell Altmeyer,
Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Randy Richard Brooks appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown
Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Brooks v. Waters, No. 2:06-cv-00084-REM-JSK (N.D.W. Va.
Mar. 12, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.