The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-6484•United States of America v. Patrick Lewis Rudd, a/k/a Louie, a/k/a One-Eyed Louie
08-6484Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 8, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6484
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
PATRICK LEWIS RUDD, a/k/a Louie, a/k/a One-Eyed Louie,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Malcolm J. Howard,
Senior District Judge. (7:97-cr-00063-H-3)
Submitted: July 31, 2008 Decided: August 8, 2008
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Patrick Lewis Rudd, Appellant Pro Se. J. Frank Bradsher, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Patrick Lewis Rudd appeals from the district court’s
order denying his motion for relief pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
60(b), in which he sought to receive credit on his federal sentence
for time served in state custody before his federal conviction. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Rudd, No. 7:97-cr-00063-H-3 (E.D.N.C.
Dec. 3, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.