The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-6374•United States of America v. Cornelius Kollock
08-6374Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 24, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6761
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CORNELIUS KOLLOCK,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
Chief District Judge. (1:00-cr-00158-WO-1)
Submitted: October 22, 2008 Decided: November 14, 2008
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cornelius Kollock, Appellant Pro Se. Anna Mills Wagoner, United
States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Cornelius Kollock appeals a district court order
denying his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) seeking a
reduction to his sentence. We have reviewed the district
court’s order and the record and affirm for the reasons cited by
the district court. See United States v. Kollock, No. 1:00-cr-
00158-WO-1 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 28, 2008). We deny Kollock’s motion
for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.