The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-6363•David E. Henderson v. HARRY PAULSON, Secretary of the Treasury; THE NATIONAL RECONAISSONCE OFFICE (NRO)
08-6363Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 30, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1861
DAVID E. HENDERSON,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
HARRY PAULSON, Secretary of the Treasury; THE NATIONAL
RECONAISSONCE OFFICE (NRO),
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District
Judge. (1:08-cv-01613-WMN)
Submitted: December 11, 2008 Decided: December 15, 2008
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David E. Henderson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
David E. Henderson appeals the district court’s order
granting his request to proceed in forma pauperis but dismissing
this case as patently frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)
(2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal
is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the
reasons stated by the district court. Henderson v. Paulson,
No. 1:08-cv-01613-WMN (D. Md. July 16, 2008). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.