The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-6290•United States of America v. Al Malik Sharief Kareem Wright
08-6290Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 24, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6685
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
AL MALIK SHARIEF KAREEM WRIGHT,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (7:92-cr-00408-GRA-1)
Submitted: October 31, 2008 Decided: November 14, 2008
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Al Malik Sharief Kareem Wright, Appellant Pro Se. David Calhoun
Stephens, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Al Malik Wright appeals from the district court’s
orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), and denying reconsideration. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Wright, No. 7:92-cr-00408-GRA-1 (D.S.C.
Mar. 17 & Apr. 1, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.