The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-6265•Edson Furtado v. THOMAS MANGER, Chief
08-6265Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 26, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6265
EDSON FURTADO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
THOMAS MANGER, Chief,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:07-cv-
03403-RWT)
Submitted: August 21, 2008 Decided: August 26, 2008
Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edson Furtado, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Edson Furtado appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Furtado v. Manger, No. 8:07-cv-03403-RWT (D. Md. Feb. 1,
2008). Furtado’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.