The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-6206•United States of America v. Kenneth R. Patterson
08-6206Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 7, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6206
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
KENNETH R. PATTERSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief
District Judge. (3:05-cr-00048-JRS-1)
Submitted: July 31, 2008 Decided: August 7, 2008
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth R. Patterson, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Ronald Gill, David
T. Maguire, Assistant United States Attorneys, Richmond, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Kenneth R. Patterson appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to file a belated direct appeal. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States
v. Patterson, No. 3:05-cr-00048-JRS-1 (E.D. Va. Jan. 10, 2008). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.