The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-6181•Ayaz Anwar Khattak v. United States of America
08-6181Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 4, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1815
AYAZ ANWAR KHATTAK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:08-cv-00507-LMB-JFA)
Submitted: October 21, 2008 Decided: October 24, 2008
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ayaz Anwar Khattak, Appellant Pro Se. R. Joseph Sher, Assistant
United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ayaz Anwar Khattak appeals the district court’s order
dismissing with prejudice his civil action filed under the
Federal Tort Claims Act. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Khattak v. United States, No.
1:08-cv-00507-LMB-JFA (E.D. Va. filed June 19, 2008, entered
June 20, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.