The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-6179•Kevin Dewayne Graham v. GERALD K. WASHINGTON, Chief Warden
08-6179Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 18, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6179
KEVIN DEWAYNE GRAHAM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GERALD K. WASHINGTON, Chief Warden; J. HARMON, Inmate Hearing
Officer; LIEUTENANT LE’SUEUR, Investigator; L. HARPER,
Internal Affairs Agent; H. DIGGS, Warden; J. KIMBRIEL,
Inspector General; R.K. DENT, Senior Assistant Chief
Investigator; N.K. BROUGHTON, Chief Special Investigator,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District
Judge. (7:07-cv-00381-sgw-mfu)
Submitted: June 6, 2008 Decided: June 18, 2008
Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kevin DeWayne Graham, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
PER CURIAM:
Kevin DeWayne Graham appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Graham v.
Washington, No. 7:07-cv-00381-sgw-mfu (W.D. Va. Dec. 31, 2007). We
deny Graham’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.