The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-6176•United States of America v. Julius Josephus Marshall
08-6176Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 4, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7260
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JULIUS JOSEPHUS MARSHALL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
Judge. (2:03-cr-00076-JBF-TEM-1)
Submitted: November 17, 2008 Decided: December 18, 2008
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Julius Josephus Marshall, Appellant Pro Se. William David Muhr,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Julius Josephus Marshall appeals the district court’s
order granting in part his motion for reduction of sentence
under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.
Marshall, No. 2:03-cr-00076-JBF-TEM-1 (E.D. Va. filed July 3,
2008 & entered July 7, 2008). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.